Saturday, 11 May 2019

May 2019 meeting

Alisdair, Alistair, Alastair, Stephen H, Andy, and Nigel met at Graham's house in Edinburgh: the sun was shining after heavy showers on the previous evening.

This was a "show and tell" meeting. Alisdair kicked off by giving us a quick look at what he's been working on recently: a small station building based on Highland Railway prototypes (at Grandtully on the Aberfeldy branch, and Guay not far away on the Perth-Inverness line) which he started at last month's meeting:

The slate roof was made by scribing styrene sheet to give the vertical edges, then cutting single-slate-height strips in the horizontal direction and staggering them when laying them. The  sides are Evergreen weatherboarding. The lamp is scratchbuilt and took a couple of evenings to get right.


He has also been working on some Highland rolling stock from Anthony Yeates' etches: a Diagram 47 open carriage truck:


and a Type A passenger brakevan in early 20th condition after rebuilding from the 1870s rib-sided original:


A restored example survives in the Museum of Scottish Railways at Bo'ness.

We had no time to hear much more about these lovely models however, since a distress call related to a burst pipe and ceiling damage meant he had to leave the scene to dash back home to Glasgow. Maybe he will tell us more next time.

Andy gave us a photo-sequence reprise of Sauchenford's baseboard construction with discussion of the lessons learned - basically, don't use soft-grade balsa as a trackbase, since it compresses when leaned on, causing gentle dips in track level which have calamitous effects on electrical pick-up and thus running quality; and don't use plain plastic point bases (the 2mmSA design has been improved since the version we used). We also discussed the disadvantages of exhibiting a shunting layout where the headshunts are "off-scene": the average exhibition visitor does not understand that  a train is being shunted and will re-appear, but instead assumes it has disappeared and walks off to a more interesting exhibit. Sauchenford's successor is already being discussed but plans remain nebulous.

Alistair showed us the latest tweaks to the track plan of his forthcoming small terminus layout. We discussed whether 4' or 3' board length is more practical, and whether a 12" depth is adequate to create a realistic background. The consensus was that 18" is better, but 12" or less can work if the viewing angles are controlled. Pete Matcham's Kyle of Lochalsh layout was mentioned, where the total depth is 6" or less. Tony Simms' recent work on Hull Bridge with low-relief building silhouettes came up as well.

Alastair discussed his South Queensferry-based layout. He has drawn up the trackplan in Templot and used this as a basis for a 2D outline sketch  from which he developed a 3D model using SolidWorks. This was turned into a plastic point base on his recently-acquired, reasonably-priced 3D extrusion printer, which has a 200x200x250mm work envelope. The advice from the group was to use 2mmSA peg chairs every third chair or so, by providing accurately-positioned holes in the 3D print. The advantage over 2mmSA standard bases is that the exact geometry of any desired formation can be printed. Interesting work. Alastair also discussed his plans for a first loco - he wanted to try his hand at an ex-Edinburgh & Glasgow Railway double-framed 2-4-0, an 1860s W.S. Brown design rebuilt by Holmes in the 1880s and withdrawn shortly before the 1914-18 war. The group's advice was that a 2-4-0 can be hard to balance and the framing would complicate the build, and that it might be better to build a simpler design first, such as an 0-6-0 tender loco. Sound advice no doubt but Alastair did not look like a man convinced. We'll follow his progress with interest.

Nigel had brought along the recently-released N Gauge Society industrial shunter so we could all have a look, and very nice it was too.


He also tried out another member's China-made binocular magnifiers of the type available on Amazon which Tim Watson recommended a few months ago on RMWeb: although the in-focus area is smaller than with normal magnifying spectacles, they allow a much more comfortable, less hunched work position, and are very effective as long as adequate light is available. The difference is plain to see:




Nigel found he could wear the binocular magnifiers over his normal prescription glasses by simply removing the safety lenses from the frame. It's important to use a head-cord (supplied with the unit) to stop them slipping forward when worn due to their weight. Admittedly, they cost three or four times as much as cheaper clip-on magnifiers, but the benefits from the more comfortable working position make this a worthwhile investment.

Nigel also gave a detailed and very interesting discussion and demonstration of progress with another recent project, and showed us some very encouraging samples. I'll not steal his thunder by discussing it further here but we were all fascinated.

And that was pretty much it, apart from a lot of further discussion and consumption of the usual bacon rolls, cake, tea and coffee. Our next meeting is likely to be in Glasgow, exceptionally on the third Saturday of the month, to avoid clashing with the forthcoming 2mmSA Tutbury supermeet which several of us hope to attend.

Saturday, 13 April 2019

April 2019 meeting

We had a fine sunny Spring day for our April meeting. Jim, Alisdair, Alistair, Andy, Gordon and Graham gathered at Simon's house in Glasgow. The occasion was the first viewing of Simon's recently-completed loft conversion, a vast, airy, sunny space which he plans to fill with various parts of the Mallaig Extension in BR days. A 2mm scale plan of Mallaig station covered part of the floor, and we were shown the start of the Glenfinnan station baseboard and detailed drawings of the well-known curved viaduct just south of that station. This project should keep Simon out of the pub for many years (or maybe it will drive him to spend more time there ...). We look forward to occasional progress reports.


This month's Short Talk was by Jim, who explained how he'd made the signal wire pulley stakes and the telegraph poles for his Kirkallanmuir layout. He designed a fold-over etch for the signal wire stakes: in practice, the etch (on the right of the laptop screen below) proved insufficently sturdy to be removed from its fret, never mind built and installed.


Not to be defeated, Jim adapted the etches using slices of 0.4mm copper wire as pulleys, and produced a workable design which he installed on Kirkallanmuir. He had brought a further set with him which he added to Sauchenford later in the day.


The characteristic Caledonian Railway A-frame telegraph poles were made from 1.5mm brass rod, tapered using sandpaper and a mini-drill (a suprisingly lengthy process: 10 or 15 minutes per post). Flats were filed at the top of the posts so they could marry to form the "A". The poles and etched cross-arms, again of Jim's own design, were assembled in a card jig made so the cross-arms could sit accurately and square to the posts while they were soldered up.


The insulators includes detail like heavier-duty spindles to lead wires off to lineside cabinets and to signalboxes. A ring of wire at the base of each pole allows them to be easily located in baseboards and removed for transport and track cleaning. Jim sprayed them with black acrylic paint from a rattle can before touching up with dark brown paint, with a dab of slightly-let-down white for the insulators.


After Jim concluded his talk, we lunched on bacon rolls (Simon raised the bar slightly by adding seasoned tomato slices: it's these wee details that matter in the FCAG, and we will be interested to see the response from future hosts) and two kinds of cake. Then it was back to the layout room for Jim to install his signal wire stakes and Alistair to install a few more trees on Sauchenford, and for the rest of us to get on with etched kits and styrene sheet buildings. Jim, ever productive, made a start on another of his own etches for a Caley lattice footbridge for Dunallander (different from the last one). By the end of the afternoon he'd already completed one side of it. You can follow his progress with this model here.


Thanks, Simon, for hosting us so spaciously (not that we're jealous or anything ... ). Next month we plan to meet in Edinburgh, at a venue to be confirmed.

Saturday, 9 March 2019

March 2019 outing

For a change this month we replaced our usual meeting with an outing to the Chris Kedgeley memorial Skills Day event organised jointly by the Scalefour and EM gauge societies, which took place this year in Linlithgow. Although the scale was 4mm rather than 2mm, there were plenty of interesting techniques to learn from, and some nice modelling to look at.

There were a few demonstrators with a 2mm connection as well. Nigel Cliffe was explaining stay-alive capacitors. He has previously explained these to the FCAG at our June 2017 meeting, as well as in his own blog:


Behind him at the other table can be seen Ian Lister, demonstrating how to create realistic stonework using Polycell Advanced Polyfilla, which he selected after trying 6 or 7 different products, since it has just the right amount of flexibility to take detail without flaking or clogging when scribed. Ian builds walls with this stuff by coating 30 thou plasticard with a 50/50 PVA/water solution then spreading on a thin, even coat of the Polyfilla with a steel artist's spatula. The PVA helps it bond. The mix is spread over the edges and left for 24 hours to set, then the edges are trimmed. Scribing is with a blunted point such as that from a compass (the kind you draw circles with, not the orienteering sort) held in a pin chuck. Patterns such as granite setts (cobblestones) can be gently pressed in using a tool made from brass channel. An old electric toothbrush makes a good orbital sander, used gently to remove crumbly edges and give a slight key before painting. Scrapings from artist's  greytone pastels are used to weather the painted walls, and very effective the finished result looked ... so much so that I forgot to take any photos, so you will have take my word for it. Ian modelled in 2FS for a while, writing up his achievements on RMWeb, before moving up to EM after his 2mm layout sadly did not survive a few years' loft storage. It was good to hear about his techniques at first hand.

Another thing I liked was John Stocks' sliding/rotating fiddle yard design. I first came across this on the Scalefour West of Scotland group's layout, "Calderside", at the 2015 Glasgow show:


John had brought his P4 Midland Railway layout "Kettlewell" to Linlithgow, so here was a chance to see how the yard worked from up close. The design has a clever interlock to prevent the table being rotated if the sliding part is not centred. Full details are to be found in Scalefour News issue 178/179/180. Here are a few pictures.
 
Above is the clever interlock. The turntable part has the exit track aligned by sliding bolts which are a snug fit in brass channels on each side of the gap. Tracks on the traversing part of the yard are aligned by further bolts in the same channel. However, the second set of bolts must be fully located into their corresponding sockets before the rotation bolts can be withdrawn - and the socket depths are arranged so that full location is only possible on the middle road. This prevents the table being rotated except when it is centrally aligned.


John mentioned that he'd found a 1.3m long yard was perfectly feasible, but that it was necessary to strengthen the table so it did not twist. A 2mm scale table with this design seems perfectly feasible.

We broke off for a while to visit the "Four Marys" pub on Linlithgow High Street for lunch.

Alistair turned out to have brought some "show and tell" with him from his 4mm days: a Nielson pug, and a Caley 1 class tank:



Then it was back to the Skills Day to learn from the experts and admire the modelling: Castle Caereinion, a nicely-presented finescale 009 layout (the owner was also showing a short length of experimental 8mm-gauge track, representing 2'0" gauge, with scratchbuilt stock running on 2mmSA wheelsets pushed in slightly on their axles!)







Another attractive layout was United Mills, which won an award at the recent Glasgow show:


Kettlewell again, with a Scalefour Society mechanical lever frame modified to include a locking tray built from brass strip with the locks made from screwheads. I should have taken a detail photo but did not :-( but I expect it is to be found on t'Interwebby somewhere. You can just see it bottom left in this photo.


There was plenty more, but I spent more time asking questions and gazing at layouts than taking photos. However, I hope this gives a flavour of what was, all in all, a very worthwhile day. Our thanks go to organisers Jim Summers and Dave Franks, who made our group very welcome, and of course to all the demonstrators and layout owners and operators.

Finally after the short train ride back to Edinburgh, there was an added bonus in finding a loco-hauled train sitting in Platform 0 (the short bay on the Up side) at Haymarket. 68006 "Daring" and 68007 "Valiant" normally work a couple of suburban services, Monday to Friday only, round the Fife Circle. These turns involve far more miles as empty stock from their base at Mossend than in revenue service. This afternoon they were topping and tailing a rake of Mk3 stock, advertised as the 1800 service to Inverkeithing, just across the Forth Bridge. Scotrail does not normally afford such luxury to Fifers on Saturday afternoons, so I assume this was an extra train to handle the crowds from the Scotland-Wales rugby international just up the road at Murrayfield.




Next month we'll be back in Glasgow for a regular FCAG meeting, and there'll be none of this heretical 4mm stuff!

Saturday, 9 February 2019

February 2019 meeting

Alisdair, Alistair, Andy, Jim, Stephen Harold, Stephen Hawkins, Phil and Graham met at Chris's house in Edinburgh for our February get-together. In a slight change of format, Alisdair had sent out homework ahead of the meeting: everyone was enjoined to bring a current project or other talking-point with them as the basis for each to give a five-minute talk. Of course the inevitable happened and each five minutes turned into 20, so that we broke for lunch before we'd got through listening to even half of the presentations. Never mind, it was all good stuff, and there will be plenty material for a future meeting.

First up was Andy, who passed round the photos and plans he's collected for his chosen prototype, Aberdour station in Fife. He reckons he can get it into an 8-foot viewing section without any compression. It's an attractive prototype, a station on a slight reverse curve with convenient overbridges at each end and a 11th-century ruined castle to one side. Maybe 2019 will be the year the model comes to life.

Discussion centred on whether it would be better to straighten the station out to simplify turnout construction. The consensus was that, provided that turnouts were built methodically, with each stage in the proper order, and not moving to a subsequent stage before being 100% satisfied with the previous one, as well as ensuring closure rails lined up with the crossing vees correctly, there was no reason not to build curved turnouts using a Templot plan.


Next to take the floor was Phil, who brought an ecumenical note to the meeting by talking about N gauge Finetrax points. He is in the process of building 46 of these as a customer order. He showed us the sintered crossing castings which look very neat. The moulded plastic base and chairs are from the same stable as the Easitrac parts familiar to 2mmSA members. Phil mentioned that it's easy to inadvertently snap the moulded chairs when trying to separate them from their sprues after threading them onto rail. He finds that very fine cutters specifically designed for sprue separation is the best solution - Xuron track cutters are too coarse - he uses Micromark cutters, I would guess these ones, although Micromark list a wide and tempting range of other cutters on their website. One of the challenges with Finetrax is attaching the operating mechanism to the tiebars, which are now of plain rather than copperclad glass-fibre strip, so that soldering a pin to the tiebar is not possible. Phil's customer only has 30mm depth below the baseboard, adding to the challenge of designing an effective operating mechanism. However, he appeared undaunted.


There was some discussion whether it still makes sense to adopt 2FS 1:152, 9.42mm gauge standards for a prototype which can be modelled with commercial 1:148, 9mm British N gauge rolling stock. Modern N wheel profiles are close to 2FS and the rail profile is the same, code 40 bullhead. A gauge slightly narrower than scale and slightly-wider flangeways are perhaps compromises worth making in the interests of finishing a layout more quickly.


Steve Harold showed us a couple of (2FS!) locos he built some time ago from Fencehouses etched kits. A J72 in BR livery:


and a project still in progress, an ex-NER Q5 0-8-0 freight loco:





The Q5's weight is in a separate tube within the boiler so it could be moved to balance the loco correctly before being fixed in place. Steve's very neat soldering was remarked upon: the result, he told us, of using 145°C melting-point solder, which "wets" the metal better than 188°C due to lower surface tension. He uses the 188°C stuff when necessary for stronger joints or to ensure bits don't fall off. Phil revealed he prefers to silver-solder frames so they don't come to bits, holding the parts together with modified wooden clothes pegs, placing small shavings of solder on the joint, and using a microflame torch to fuse the solder.

Another point of interest was Stephen's simple but effective frame to allow spray painting of a chassis, simply bent up from stiff wire.


Jim took us through the design process of his current project, a lattice footbridge for the Grampian group's Dunallander project started by the late Neil Ballantine. The footbridge, the second one at the north end of Dunblane station, replaced a standard Caledonian Railway wooden design and probably dated from the 1920s (it was removed in the 1970s). The original plans have not been uncovered, so Jim's design is based on the few available photos and a knowledge of Caley lattice bridge practice elsewhere, as well as detailed measurements of the site it has to fit on the layout. Not at all a simple matter, as he explained with the help of his laptop and Autocad.

That was the end of the talks, since it was lunchtime. Chris served up his home-made soup and large stacks of bacon rolls. After lunch, we made a concerted effort to re-gauge and generally renovate Sauchenford's fiddle yard cassettes, made from aluminium angle "rails" screwed to a plywood strip base with styrene-sheet side walls. The decision to use small woodscrews to attach the angle to the ply was in retrospect a mistake, since they have not held their positions tightly enough and are forever going out of gauge after handling. The angles were carefully gauged and glued in place this time. We will see whether this works better in the long term.

Before we finished up, Alisdair's Caley Jumbo (294 class) was given a quick airing. He recently drop-tested the model, chipping the chimney, but he gave it a quick swipe with a file and it seems little the worse. It looks quite the part of a loco at the end of its service life, with replacement lum (chimney), dome cover and safety-valves, wearing a class K (branch freight or ballast train) lamp to signify how far down the pecking-order it has fallen. (The chromed bull-bar sported on its buffer-beam is in fact an Electra coupling hook).


Shortly before we finished up, Chris gave us a quick demo of his low-cost DCC system, based on an Arduino microcontroller with a Motorshield board to drive a 15V supply to the track. Just over £40 for these two, or half that if Chinese copies are used. Free open-source JMRI software is used to control the Arduino with Engine Driver software allowing a mobile phone to be used in place of a PC. Chris demo'd this working with his 4F, a design with enough space to hide the Zemo 622N chip (another £20) which Nigel Cliffe had recommended to him as a good option to dip a low-cost toe in the DCC water. The loco's controllability on his test track was most impressive - proof that DCC does not have to cost a fortune and that a low-cost trial is very feasible if you are curious to see if it suits you.

The next group meeting will hopefully consist of a visit to the EM/S4 societies' Skills Day in Linlithgow in March to find out how things are done when you can actually see what you're modelling ... We will re-convene in Glasgow in April. Thanks Chris for top-class catering, and for tolerating our invasion of your household.

Saturday, 12 January 2019

January 2019

Alisdair, Alistair, Andy, Chris, Stephen Harold and long-time-dormant FCAG member Stephen Hawkins met at Graham's house for the first get-together of 2019. This month's Short Talk, by Stephen Harold, concerned his day job as a power controller at the DRS control office in Carlisle: ensuring that serviceable locos are available for scheduled workings and that scheduled maintenance is performed on time. We had an extensive explanation with many questions answered: thanks Stephen.

There was quite a lot of "admin" discussion, now that the group is regularly six people or more it is less convenient than before to met at members' houses so we are investigating what alternatives might be available. If you know of premises we could use on a Saturday afternoon once every two months in either Edinburgh or Glasgow areas, do let Alisdair Campbell know.

Sauchenford got a little more work on the fit of the cassettes in the fiddle yards.






Over the Christmas period, Stephen and Alisdair fitted new connector clips to mate with the aluminium angle of the cassettes:




Some initial disappointment was seen when a test loco derailed consistently due to a hard-to-detect track fault. Eventually we realised there was no track fault: the bogie of the diesel loco was binding on the body and throwing it off the track at a slight curve! That was soon fixed, and we were a little further down the road of improved reliability.


Next month's venue is not finalised and will be communicated by the usual e-mail to 2mm members within Scotland. If you feel like coming along, or want to see what 2mm finescale looks like before joining the Association, just get in touch with Alisdair Campbell via the Data Officer contact mentioned here. Or come to Model Rail Scotland on 22-24 February in Glasgow, where we'll be manning the 2mmSA stand.

Sunday, 9 December 2018

December 2018 meeting

On a cold day in Edinburgh, we nonetheless mustered a table-full of 2mm modellers: Alisdair, Alistair, Andy, Jim, Stephen, Chris, Phil, and Roy from the Grampian group met at Graham's house.

After the customary tea, coffee, chat, soup, bacon rolls, and mince pies (thanks Roy), we proceeded to this month's demonstration. This was by Alisdair, who showed us how to (irreversibly!) modify commercial N gauge metal-tyred wagon wheels for use on 2mm finescale track. His chosen weapon was his 1970s-vintage Unimat lathe, still going strong and useful for all kinds of small modelling jobs.


The 2mm finescale standards are given in the Association Yearbook and online. For convenience the relevant tables are reproduced here.


The main dimension of interest is FW, the flange width. These tend to be around 0.5mm in modern N wheelsets, and although this is an improvement on the 0.7mm common on older wagons, it is still too wide to reliably go through the 2mm pointwork wing-rail flangeway (WF) and check-rail flangeway (CF) at 0.48mm and 0.53mm respectively. The 2mm standard for FW is 0.3mm. Cosmetically, it is also worthwhile reducing the tread width (TR) to 1.0mm, so that the wheel profile looks more prototypical.

Alisdair explained he'd first tried modifying wheelsets when he first moved to 2mm scale from 4mm. He found an article in "Model Railways" which recommended using collets to hold wheels. It seemed to make sense, so he turned his own collets in the Unimat from brass and sawed slits so they could be compressed gently in a three-jaw chuck to hold the wheelset by the tyre of one wheel, without removing the wheels from the axle.


The first one didn't work, because he had not tapered the inner diameter to suit the wheel tyre coning. The second one, with taper, worked once then also lost grip. Frustrated, Alisdair put the collets to one side and resigned himself to buying new wheelsets from the 2mmSA shop or sending N wheelsets off to the Association's wheel turning service. Which as we all know is very efficient and remarkably good value. But there was still a nagging wish for the satisfaction of doing the job himself.

A chance conversation with 2mmSA magazine editor (and former FCAG regular) Anthony Yeates suggested a new direction: simply hold the wheelset lightly in the three-jaw chuck , and support the other end at the axle pinpoint in a length of brass tube in the tailstock chuck. The tube acts as a "hollow dead centre", holding the axle concentric and providing enough support for a tool to be used to turn down the wheel flange and face. Here's the tube in position in the tailstock chuck.



To cut the metal, a boring tool was used, since it was small enough to fit between the two wheelsets on the axle. The aim is to do the work without removing the wheels from the axle, which risks destroying their concentricity. After setting and trueing the wheelset in the chuck with the axle in the tailstock support, the first operation is to thin the flange of the wheel in the 3-jaw chuck, then without disturbing the workpiece, thin the tyre of the other wheel. The chuck is then slackened off, the workpiece reversed and trued again, and the second flange and tyre are dealt with.

Here's the operation in detail. First the wheelset is gripped in the three-jaw chuck, which is tightened to hold the wheel lightly.


The support tube is placed in the tailstock chuck which is tightened firmly and rotated to check for concentricity. The tailstock is then advanced to the axle end:

and its spindle advanced so the tube is positioned on the axle pinpoint so there is no slack, but without undue pressure.

The chuck is spun once or twice by hand to check the whole thing is concentric, then tightened firmly using its tommy bars. It's important not to overtighten the chuck, or the wheel tyre will be dimpled and ruined. Don't forget to remove the tommy bars from the chuck!

Here's the setup viewed from behind - headstock and 3-jaw chuck now on the right, tailstock on the left. We're going to remove metal from the green-line side of the flange first until dimension FW is 0.3mm, then from the green-line side of the tread until dimension TW is 1.3mm.

The flange width is measured with a vernier gauge to determine its current width, 0.3mm is subtracted, and that's the amount of metal which needs to be removed. At this point a graduated handwheel on the tailstock is very useful, to give a fairly reliable indication of how far to go.
With the lathe still switched off, the tool is advanced until the edge is just touching the back of the wheel, backed off slightly,
then eye protection is worn and power is switched on (Alisdair use a fairly high cutting speed for brass, about twice that recommended for steel, with spit as lubrication)
and the flange is thinned with a multitude of light cuts, each time feeding the tool from the flange edge towards the axle, backing out, then advancing the tailstock slightly with its handwheel and taking the next cut.

Once the dimension judged by the handwheel gradation is close, the lathe is stopped and the flange dimension checked with the vernier gauge.
then the flange is brought to size with a final light cut or two.

Next the tread width of the other wheel on the axle is reduced, with the same technique. Care is required since the wheel may move on the axle if too heavy a cut is taken

The lathe is stopped, and the wheelset reversed in the three-jaw chuck, and with the lathe under power, the squared-off edge of the first reduced flange is given a light touch from an nail file emery board (from a chemist or pound shop, or swiped from a dressing table) to round it off, to avoid it catching on point blades, risking derailment. (The photo shows the principle, but in practice the tailstock support would be engaged).
Then the same set of operations is carried out again, to reduce the second flange and second tread and round off the second flange back. 

The comparison shows the difference in appearance between unmodified and reduced wheelsets.
The wheels are now set to gauge and are ready for use in a wagon or coach. Disc locomotive wheels can be dealt with in the same manner, but spoked wheels generally can only have the flange reduced since the spokes will distort or shatter due to lack of support if an attempt is made to reduce the tread width.

Alisdair also showed us his latest wheel manufacture efforts, having rejected those he showed us last month.


The tyre is turned from steel. The brass insert is made by turning a disc and half axle as one piece, ensuring that the disc is a snug fit in the tyre. Spoke position are marked out using the lathe (switched off) as a dividing engine: the insert is held by its half axle in a chuck in the headstock, a tool is placed in the toolholder which is advanced to scratch a reference mark on the edge of the disk, the tool is backed off, then the headstock rotated by hand the correct number of degrees, and the position of the next spoke scratched on by advancing the tool. If there are no angular positions marked on the headstock, it is easy enough to add a paper disk or marker pen dots. Once the spoke positions are marked out, the spokes are cut and filed to shape. We did not find out whether the inserts are glued or soldered in place. Maybe Alisdair has not got that far yet!

After this we had intended to do some further work on Sauchenford's fiddle yards. Alisdair was meant to have brought these with him from Glasgow, but unfortunately when he unpacked his car he found he'd left them behind. So there was nothing for it but to unpack individual projects and get on with that.

Thanks Alisdair for an informative talk which demystified another 2mm "dark art".